Tuning the signal
AI AUTOMATION
Hand-keying 40 records a day into a CRM is ~6 hours a week — and every error compounds. Our senior team (12+ years) builds bounded automations: a human approves anything that goes live. Free diagnosis first.
Threshold 80%. Anything below is held, not sent.
Auto-reply sent to 142 leads…
3 went to the wrong recipient. Nobody checked.
WHERE IT'S COSTING YOU
Each of these is a load-bearing workaround — quiet until the week it breaks. The free diagnosis ranks them by what they actually cost you.
Categorising enquiries, extracting document fields, drafting routine replies — AI handles these at volume, with a human review step on anything outside normal parameters.
Ranked first · diagnosed and costed before any quote
When every inbound request needs a human to classify it before work starts, the queue builds. AI triage with a human escalation path cuts that delay.
No-code platforms handle simple linear flows. They struggle with variable inputs, conditional logic, and natural language. Custom automations handle edge cases properly.
Every automation Anito builds produces a structured log of inputs, model outputs, confidence scores, and human decisions — so you can account for every run.
Automations that write to live systems without a human review gate cause real damage when they misbehave. Anito never deploys anything that touches live operations without an approval step.
Most AI pilots fail because they target a vague problem. The diagnosis ranks candidate automations by hours saved and risk surfaced — so you commit only where the return is concrete.
WHAT WE BUILD
Every automation Anito builds has three non-negotiable components: a confidence threshold that escalates uncertain items to a human, a structured log of every decision, and a rollback path for anything that can be undone. If the workflow is not a good candidate — volume too low, edge cases too many, risk too concentrated — Anito will say so rather than build something that creates more problems than it solves.
Foundational to the portfolio — often a prerequisite for the others.
Impact score (0–100) · hover a bar
Emails, contracts, invoices, and forms classified by type and priority — key fields extracted and routed to the right queue, automatically.
Pull specific fields from PDFs, scanned documents, or free-text forms into your CRM or database — with a confidence score and a human review flag on anything uncertain.
Draft replies to enquiries or support tickets using your knowledge base — reviewed and sent by a human, never published automatically.
When a lead arrives, a form is submitted, or a status changes, a multi-step workflow fires — notifying the right person, updating the record, logging the action.
Scheduled automations that compare records across systems, flag discrepancies, and deliver a daily summary your team acts on rather than compiles.
A simple review interface where staff approve, reject, or annotate each item before it is committed — built into the workflow, not bolted on afterward.
HOW THE BOUNDARY WORKS
Drag the confidence threshold. The green items run automatically; the rest queue for staff review — never sent, never billed until a person approves.
BY THE NUMBERS
A confidence threshold routes uncertain items to a human, keeping the error rate low while still handling the majority of volume. The calculation is simple: daily volume x per-record time x 5 days x salary cost. The diagnosis applies that to your specific process and confirms whether the build recovers cost in under 12 months — or tells you it does not. Logs are exported in a format you can connect to your own reporting.
The senior who scopes your project is the one writing the code. Repos, hosting, and every credential sit in your accounts from the first commit — a developer disappearing is not a scenario that applies to you.
Typical salary hours recovered weekly on a focused single-workflow build
Actions on live systems without a human approval step
Black-box decisions without a structured audit log
Senior replies throughout deployment
COMMON QUESTIONS
Every automation includes a confidence threshold — below that floor, the system flags the item for human review rather than processing it automatically. Anything that writes to a live database, sends a message, or triggers a payment requires an explicit human approval step.
RELATED SERVICES
A workaround that became load-bearing is now your biggest risk. Our senior team (12+ years) replaces the patchwork with one system you own outright — code and credentials, day one. The diagnosis is free.
ExploreServiceTwo to five hours a week filling the gap between tools that should already talk. Our senior team (12+ years) connects CRMs, payments, and field-service tools. A two-system integration runs $2,000–$8,000; the diagnosis maps it first.
ExploreServiceWork happens on-site; the record is created hours later — and that gap is where invoices go wrong. Our senior team (12+ years) builds field tools so the paperwork can't wait. Free diagnosis, no deposit.
ExploreYOUR NEXT STEP
If the hours recovered do not justify the build cost, the diagnosis calculates that before you spend a dollar. You get a written workflow summary, a fixed-cost estimate, and a plain-English breakdown of what the automation handles, flags, and does not touch. Take it to any other developer. No pitch, no retainer, no deposit.
No deposit until scope is agreed. If the diagnosis shows we are not the right fit, we will tell you — and you owe nothing.
Direct senior reply · No obligation after the diagnosis